|
| 23 декабря, 2014 | | | Читать на сайте издания |
By Alena Sivkova, Izvestia, 23 December
Dmitry Kobylkin and Anatoly Artamonov staked out a leadership position, and Sergei Yastrebov and Andrei Shevelev have not been able to get out of the "group of death"
Civil Society Development Foundation (FoRGO), headed by Konstantin Kostin supported by a team of experts presented the 2014 final efficiency rating of governors. This time, in contrast to the regular issues of the specialists did not carry out new case studies and analysis of economic statistics - evaluation of Governors received for the entire 2014 year.
Konstantin Kostin said "Izvestia" that it was not right to compare the dynamics of the effectiveness of the governors in the final ranking to the regular one, but noted that in general, the overall evaluation of the dynamics of regional leaders is positive and the total number of points you gain all participants rating increases. In addition, he noted that the first overall performance rating of governors will be a good help for the final ranking in 2015, because the results will be a point of reference for the calculation and measurement of results and dynamics "in a difficult, but very interesting 2015".
- The final ranking presents situational factors, situational changes that have occurred over the past month or two, to a lesser extent affect the position of a party, because we evaluate a set of results. We analyze the average results, after which we sum up them to avoid situational fluctuations so that the overall rating really reflected the situation in a particular subject through the final place of a governor, - he said.
In addition, Konstantin Kostin noted that there were no significunt ups and downs in the final rating.
- We can see the position corrections of some members in groups. One left the "group of death" , another, on the contrary, came in. This is a kind of benchmark for rating the effectiveness of Heads of Subjects next year. Of course, for governors efficiency will become one of the major factors that will help them to overcome the crisis. One have to be strong to make decisions quickly and flexibly respond to emerging challenges, without losing sight of the main goals of development of the region - said Konstantin Kostin.
Ten leaders
Traditional top ten has not changed much - it was transformed into the top ten at the end of 2014. Alignment on the "pedestal" the most effective governors remained virtually unchanged - the head of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Okrug Dmitry Kobylkin continues to hold the lead with a small margin, followed by go head Kaluga region Anatoly Artamonov and Tatarstan President Rustam Minnikhanov.
Anatoly Artamonov, who took second place in the final ranking, and earlier in the same rating was placed on high positions. Due to this he was a leader of positive stability.
The reasons falling Artamonov and other heads of the Federation to the group of positive sustainability experts call stable progress in socio-economic development of the region and the high personal authority residents subject.
- Probably, the fact that we are working tirelessly. Of course, listen to the people, or so many years working in his office, I would simply not necessary. I think the main thing in his work the economy - said, "Izvestia" Anatoly Artamonov. - Developing the economy and getting from this additional income and well-off people with a decent income, it is possible to solve all the other problems. If the economy does not develop, everything else is just wishful thinking.
In the final issue the number of governors in the group of leaders has been increased - their "prizes" where Section 25 governors. Position from the 8th to 10th place in this time took the head of the Komi Republic Vyacheslav Gaiser, Chukotka Autonomous Okrug, Roman Kopin and Sergey Sobyanin. The top six Nizhny Novgorod Governor Valery Shantsev, compared with the previous regular rating improved their performance on four points.
WINNERS AND LOSERS
By analogy with the top ten experts conducted "upgrade" traditional fives rise and fall. If in the previous period, they were calculated for the period from one month to two (depending on the period between specific editions), now considered the results over a longer period - for the year.
Thus, the leader of growth, rising to 12 positions, became governor of the Ivanovo region Pavel skating (experts are responsible for this success in the elections and the creation of conditions for open electoral campaigns), the remaining members of the five indicators below 10 positions. For example, the Governor of Rostov Region Vasily Golubev added seven positions (due to the successful resolution of humanitarian problems that have arisen in connection with the civil war in the Ukraine).
One of the top gainers in the ranking was the head of Khakassia Viktor Zimin, he got six stitches. This head of the Federation experts noted a favorable trend in public opinion polls, which shows an increase in positive attitudes to it by the people.
- We're just doing our job and try to make it as good as possible. Focus - the development of agriculture, because for us it is very important that on our shelves that something was. And now, when prices are rising again, strengthen the budget for the year of agriculture - said Viktor Zimin. - His youth regardless of whether the guys apartments, houses, give free land for the construction of cottages. 37 thousand. Plots yet to be issued, and 6 thousand. Plots have already found their owners. Focus is on the construction site, we need at home. Even from other cities who have graduated from our universities, we also allocate land to keep them we live and work. Something for six years has already been done.
Among regional leaders who most reduced their positions in the past year, the Governor of Ryazan Region Oleg Kovalev, who has lost 19 positions. 17 positions down the head of Mari El Leonid Markelov. Experts note that the main reasons for the fall - a criticism from civil society, the problems in building intra consensus, the lack of results in solving social and economic problems in the region, as well as problems with the creation of conditions for open and competitive elections.
Kaliningrad Governor Nikolai Tsukanov whose work many were dissatisfied, also lost 17 positions.
Experts point to the fact that the head of the western region of the Federation, there are some problems in building relationships with internal elite.
Political scientist and specialist in the Kaliningrad Region Vladimir Abramov confirmed "Izvestia" that among the ruling elites of the region there are contradictions, although lately they are trying to make their smaller disputes on public display.
- The regional government have been in an opposition for half a year to the Baltic municipality. Yes, in principle, the contradictions were typical for the region, but a tough fight between them subsided, the last round of the conflict parties reached in 2013, - he said. - Since then, public explanation of the relationship we have virtually no, no obvious opponents. And even if under the carpet, and something happens, now dirty linen in public is not submitted.
Head of the Department of Regional Studies Center for Political Technologies, Rostislav Turovsky believes that the leaders of growth rating were those who initially did not show serious leadership ambitions.
- Indicators of growth leaders are associated with a number of successes in the elections of governors, respectively, to give them the support of voters and the consolidation of the elites in the regions. And the growth has occurred in those governors who have starting positions were more complex. For example, in the Murmansk region and Bashkiria noted conflicts elites. And the governor of the Ivanovo region Pavel skating in the beginning of his term is not seen as a strong figure of a regional leader. Therefore, their sharp increase reflects the acquisition of political influence and win over the mass of voters. On the other hand, the rating reflects the fairly successful process of gradual preparation for the upcoming elections, an example - Rostov Region Governor Vasily Golubev - said the expert.
Leaders of the fall of the final rating analyst described as a group, complex composition.
- You can pay attention to the decline in those who are preparing for the elections. Here in the problem areas get Alexander Vinnikov (Jewish Autonomous Region), Nikolai Tsukanov (Kaliningrad region) and Leonid Markelov (Mari El). They also observed conflicts with the ONF. And about Oleg Korolev (Lipetsk region) may be noted that the part of the drafters of the rankings to claim it was still in the election - said Rostislav Turovsky.
An example of sustainable
At this time, have been identified as the most stable governors, who for years kept its position in the ranking. According to experts, leaders, caught in the Top 5, characterized by stability and the ability to maintain its high performance throughout the year. The most stable have been recognized the undisputed leader of the Governor of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Okrug Dmitry Kobylkin, as well as the head of the Kaluga region Anatoly Artamonov. They are followed by the head of Tatarstan Rustam Minnikhanov, the governor of the Kemerovo region Aman Tuleyev and the head of Dagestan Ramazan Abdullatipov - all of them over the past year will be remembered sustained success in social and economic development of their regions, and won high personal credibility with residents of their subjects.
President of the Center for Strategic Communications Dmitry Abzalov believes that the results of the final rating are important primarily for themselves governors.
- Next year, as expected, it will be very serious challenge for governors. So many have gone on primaries, to avoid affecting the economic and social aspects that will be crucial in the next year. Therefore, for the new heads of subjects it will be a test, especially for those who have elections are planned for the next two years - drew attention to the expert.
- Despite the fact that next year is not elected at the federal level, it will be a very important aspect of the economy. Depreciation of the ruble and economic difficulties objectively lead to lower standards of living in some regions. Governors will depend on the efficiency of decision-making. They will have to prove their efficiency, actively engaged in the regulation, including food security, employment. That is the situation requires more active heads of subjects. The political scientist also drew attention to the fact that in 2015 will be significant for many governors.
- The next two years will be a real challenge for many governors. They need to listen to the rankings, to understand what really objective problems they exist. This rating, as the last few shows that the most important factor is not only the activities of governors, but the news coverage of what they do. If the activities of the governors properly explained, it leads to costs in the image. They should be able to speak to the electorate - concluded Dmitry Abzalov.
"Group of death"
In the "basement" only one change: Kaliningrad Governor Nikolai Tsukanov moved into a group with an average rating, it has replaced the head of Karelia Alexander Khudilainen. With 49 points, he became one of three leaders, who took 78-80 th place together with the governor of Perm Krai Viktor Basargin and head of North Ossetia Taimuraz Mamsurov.
Alexander himself Khudilainen questioned the veracity of the study.
- I can only say that understanding and support of the population of Karelia we have, but if you want to publish any ratings, then let the public. Authorities know best what is important for the population: the ratings or the ratio of residents and real work - said the head of Karelia.
Prime candidates for departure has traditionally become the head of the Yaroslavl region Sergey Yastrebov and the governor of the Tver region Andrei move - in the final release, they again took the last position.
Note: in order to obtain the correct result of the rise and fall of leaders includes only those regional leaders who have demonstrated the stability of estimated parameters in all five research modules.
As reasons for the hit specific governors of the five leaders of positive stability, experts have called stable progress in socio-economic development of the region and the high personal authority among residents of a specific subject of the Russian Federation.